A Mathematical Model of Dental Caries Used to Evaluate the Benefits of Alternative Frequencies of Bitewing Radiographs

Michael Shwartz, Joseph S. Pliskin, Hans-Göran Gröndahl and Joseph Boffa
Additional contact information
Michael Shwartz: Health Care Management Program, School of Management, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Joseph S. Pliskin: Department of Industrial Engineering and Management and Center for Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Hans-Göran Gröndahl: Department of Oral Radiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Joseph Boffa: Dental Care Management Program, Goldman School of Graduate Dentistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Management Science, 1987, vol. 33, issue 6, 771-783

Abstract: This paper describes the development of a mathematical model that can provide the basis for a decision support system to aid dentists (or patients) in making decisions about how often to perform (or receive) bitewing radiographs. The model, which describes the initiation and progression of approximal dental caries, is developed from an analysis of 4 to 13 sets of serial bitewing radiograph exams taken on over 700 individuals. Caries incidence is modeled as follows: (1) there is an underlying gamma distribution representing variation in an individual's expected annual number of new lesions; (2) an individual's distribution of new lesions in a year follows a Poisson process with expected value that can be thought of as having been randomly selected from the gamma distribution. Progression is modeled by assuming duration of carious lesions in each half of the dental enamel can be approximated by a piecewise exponential distribution. Using this model, we determine the relationship between when the next set of bitewing radiographs is performed and the probability carious lesions are detected before any lesions reach the inner half of the dentin. For high risk individuals with no unrestored enamel lesions from their last set of radiographs, bitewings should be scheduled yearly; for low risk individuals with no unrestored enamel lesions, bitewings could be scheduled every 2.5 to 3 years, though both of these conclusions depend on the patient's and/or dentist's attitude toward risk.

Keywords: health care: dental diagnosis; probability: Markov processes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.6.771 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:33:y:1987:i:6:p:771-783

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().