The Effects of Splitting Attributes on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurement
Franz Eisenführ and
Detlof von Winterfeldt
Additional contact information
Franz Eisenführ: Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Templergraben 64, 5100 Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany
Detlof von Winterfeldt: Systems Science Department, Institute of Safety and Systems Management, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0021
Management Science, 1988, vol. 34, issue 4, 431-445
This study examined how weights in multiattribute utility measurement change when objectives are split into more detailed levels. Subjects were asked to weight attributes in value trees containing three objectives which were specified by either three, four, five, or six attributes. The robust finding was that the more detailed parts of the value tree were weighted significantly higher than the less detailed ones. This overweighting bias was found for several weighting techniques, but the techniques that used holistic judgments to derive weights were affected somewhat less than techniques that used decomposed attribute weights. This bias is interpreted in terms of the increased salience and availability of attributes that are spelled out in more detail.
Keywords: multiattribute utility; value trees; structuring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (40) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:4:p:431-445
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Matthew Walls ().