Competitive Strategies for Late Entry into a Market with a Dominant Brand
Gregory S. Carpenter and
Kent Nakamoto
Additional contact information
Gregory S. Carpenter: J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Kent Nakamoto: Karl Eller Graduate School of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Management Science, 1990, vol. 36, issue 10, 1268-1278
Abstract:
This paper considers optimal positioning, advertising, and pricing strategies for a firm contemplating entry in a market dominated by an entrenched competitor. Drawing on behavioral research on consumer preference formation, we develop an individual-level model that reflects differing consumer responses to similar products offered by the dominant brand and later entrants---an effect we term asymmetric preferences. From the resulting aggregate market response model, we derive several competitive implications, notably (1) that preference asymmetry can make a differentiated late entry strategy optimal even if preferences would appear to dictate otherwise, and (2) that me-too strategies are not equilibrium late entry strategies. More generally, our analysis suggests that preference asymmetry can contribute to the persistent competitive advantage of dominant brands.
Keywords: competition; late entry strategy; preference asymmetry; dominant brands (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.10.1268 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:36:y:1990:i:10:p:1268-1278
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().