Comparison of Weighting Judgments in Multiattribute Utility Measurement

Katrin Borcherding, Thomas Eppel and Detlof von Winterfeldt
Additional contact information
Katrin Borcherding: Institut fuer Psychologie, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, D-6100 Darmstadt, Germany
Thomas Eppel: Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Detlof von Winterfeldt: Institute of Safety and Systems Management, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089

Management Science, 1991, vol. 37, issue 12, 1603-1619

Abstract: This paper compares four weighting methods in multiattribute utility measurement: the ratio method, the swing weighting method, the tradeoff method and the pricing out method. 200 subjects used these methods to weight attributes for evaluating nuclear waste repository sites in the United States. The weighting methods were compared with respect to their internal consistency, convergent validity, and external validity. Internal consistency was measured by the degree to which ordinal and cardinal or ratio responses agreed within the same weighting method. Convergent validity was measured by the degree of agreement between the weights elicited with different methods. External validity was determined by the degree to which weights elicited in this experiment agreed with weights that were elicited with managers of the Department of Energy. In terms of internal consistency, the tradeoff method fared worst. In terms of convergent validity, the pricing out method turned out to be an outlier. In terms of external validity, the pricing out method showed the best results. While the ratio and swing methods are quite consistent and show a fair amount of convergent validity, their external validity problems cast doubt on their usefulness. The main recommendation for applications is to improve the internal consistency of the tradeoff method by careful interactive elicitation and to use it in conjunction with the pricing out method to enhance its external validity.

Keywords: tradeoffs; weights; multiattribute utility; nuclear waste disposal; decision analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (61)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.12.1603 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:37:y:1991:i:12:p:1603-1619

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().