Risk, Return, Skewness and Preference

Patrick L. Brockett and Yehuda Kahane
Additional contact information
Patrick L. Brockett: Departments of Finance, Mathematics, Management Science and Information Systems, and Applied Research Laboratories, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712-1179
Yehuda Kahane: Erhard Insurance Center, Faculty of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Management Science, 1992, vol. 38, issue 6, 851-866

Abstract: This paper considers choice between individual projects and shows that when the choice set includes arbitrary distributions, then any assumed relationship between expected utility theory and general moment preferences for individual decision makers is theoretically unsound. In particular, a risk averse investor with any common utility function may, when choosing between two positive return opportunities, prefer the project simultaneously having a lower mean, higher variance, and lower positive skewness. Moreover, the decision maker can prefer opportunities with higher variance even when the opportunities are continuous, unimodal, and arbitrarily visually and statistically close to the normal distribution in shape. Our conclusions hold for any decision maker with a utility function whose derivatives alternate in sign being strictly positive or negative (i.e., we exclude the uninteresting cases of quadratic and cubic utilities). The method of analysis is based upon the theory of Tchebychev systems of functions which deals with the expected value of [utility] functions of stochastic variables with known moments. Although we focus on the first three moments, the results, as presented here, apply to all higher moments as well. It is also shown that there can be extremely large deviations between the certainty equivalents of distributions having the same moments, so this result is also pertinent to practical decision analysts as well. The paper demonstrates that the properties of utility functions have implications which are much more subtle than previously recognized for evaluating distributions in terms of their moments.

Keywords: moment ordering; CAPM; rational decision making; counter examples (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.6.851 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:38:y:1992:i:6:p:851-866

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().