Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis

James E. Smith and Robert F. Nau
Additional contact information
James E. Smith: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Box 90120 Durham, North Carolina 27708
Robert F. Nau: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Box 90120 Durham, North Carolina 27708

Management Science, 1995, vol. 41, issue 5, 795-816

Abstract: In the academic literature and professional practice, there are a number of alternative and apparently competing methods for valuing risky projects. In this paper, we compare and contrast three different approaches: risk-adjusted discount-rate analysis, option pricing analysis, and decision analysis, focusing on the last two. We show that, in contrast to some of the claims made in the "real options" literature, when both option pricing and decision analysis methods are correctly applied, they must give consistent results. We also explore ways in which option pricing and decision analysis methods can be profitably integrated. In particular, we show how option pricing techniques can be used to simplify decision analysis when some risks can be hedged by trading and, conversely, how decision analysis techniques can be used to extend option pricing techniques to problems with incomplete securities markets.

Keywords: valuation; option pricing theory; decision analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (146)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.5.795 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:41:y:1995:i:5:p:795-816

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().