Unreasonable Rationality?

Dana R. Clyman
Additional contact information
Dana R. Clyman: Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22906

Management Science, 1995, vol. 41, issue 9, 1538-1548

Abstract: This paper explores how fractional demands (the optimal fraction of wealth invested in a security) change upon exogenous changes in security returns and wealth. In the first part of the paper, the analysis is conducted in an Arrow-Debreu framework. Here we demonstrate the counterintuitive but completely rational result that fractional demands can remain unchanged or in fact decrease upon an exogenous increase in return. Furthermore, we show that this can occur without any offsetting wealth effect. In the second part of the paper, we apply these results to ordinary securities (those composed of fixed portfolios of Arrow-Debreu securities). Here we derive a complete analytical solution and show that portfolio managers should beware. Even correct information that the return from holding an underlying pure security will improve is not sufficient to conclude that one should increase (or decrease) one's holdings of any particular stock.

Keywords: rationality; subjective expected utility; descriptive or behavioral decision theory; log or logarithmic utility; fractional demands; Arrow-Debreu securities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.9.1538 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:41:y:1995:i:9:p:1538-1548

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().