Indicators of Ill-Conditioned Data Sets and Model Misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Extended Facet Approach

O. B. Olesen and N. C. Petersen
Additional contact information
O. B. Olesen: Department of Management, Odense University, Odense, Denmark
N. C. Petersen: Department of Management, Odense University, Odense, Denmark

Management Science, 1996, vol. 42, issue 2, 205-219

Abstract: Date Envelopment Analysis (DEA) employs mathematical programming to measure the relative efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs). This paper is concerned with development of indicators to determine whether or not the specification of the input and output space is supported by data in the sense that the variation in data is sufficient for estimation of a frontier of the same dimension as the input output space. Insufficient variation in data implies that some inputs/outputs can be substituted along the efficient frontier but only in fixed proportions. Data thus locally supports variation in a subspace of a lower dimension rather than in the input output space of full dimension. Each segment of the efficient frontier is in this sense subject to local collinearity. Insufficient variation in data provides a bound on admissible disaggregations in cases where substitution in fixed proportions is incompatible with a priori information concerning the production process. A data set incapable of estimating a frontier of full dimension will in this case be denoted ill-conditioned. It is shown that the existence of well-defined marginal rates of substitution along the estimated strongly efficient frontier segments requires the existence of Full Dimensional Efficient Facets (FDEFs). A test for the existence of FDEFs is developed, and an operational two-stage procedure for efficiency evaluation relative to an over-all non-fixed technology is developed; the two-stage procedure provides a lower and an upper bound on the efficiency index for each DMU.

Keywords: efficiency measurement; data envelopment analysis; facets; virtual multipliers; model misspecification; rates of sustitutions; maintained hypotheses; Frontier estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (76)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.2.205 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:42:y:1996:i:2:p:205-219

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().