Goal-Based Construction of Preferences: Task Goals and the Prominence Effect
Gregory W. Fischer,
Ziv Carmon,
Dan Ariely and
Gal Zauberman
Additional contact information
Gregory W. Fischer: Duke University, Fuqua School of Business, Durham, North Carolina 27708
Ziv Carmon: Duke University, Fuqua School of Business, Durham, North Carolina 27708
Dan Ariely: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Gal Zauberman: Duke University, Fuqua School of Business, Durham, North Carolina 27708
Management Science, 1999, vol. 45, issue 8, 1057-1075
Abstract:
Preferences inferred from choice are more likely to favor the alternative that is superior with respect to the prominent (most important or salient) attribute than are preferences inferred from matching (direct tradeoff) judgments. This prominence effect violates standard models of rational choice and complicates the task of measuring preferences. In this article, we propose a new task-goal hypothesisregarding the prominence effect: The prominent attribute receives more weight in tasks whose goal is to differentiate among options than in tasks whose goal is to equate options. We use this hypothesis to generalize the prominence effect beyond choice and matching to several additional tasks, including the choice-based matching and difference comparison methods that are widely employed in decision analysis. The results of three studies provide strong support for the task-goal account of the prominence effect and cast doubt on competing explanations. We discuss the implications of these findings for descriptive decision theory and for preference measurement in decision analysis, public policy, and marketing.
Keywords: multiattribute utility; preference assessment; preference reversals; prominence effect; task goals (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (49)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1057 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:45:y:1999:i:8:p:1057-1075
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().