Process and Product Improvement in Manufacturing Systems with Correlated Stages

Paul F. Zantek (), Gordon P. Wright () and Robert D. Plante ()
Additional contact information
Paul F. Zantek: R. H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Gordon P. Wright: Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1310
Robert D. Plante: Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1310

Management Science, 2002, vol. 48, issue 5, 591-606

Abstract: Manufacturing systems typically contain processing and assembly stages whose output quality is significantly affected by the output quality of preceding stages in the system. This study offers and empirically validates a procedure for (1) measuring the effect of each stage's performance on the output quality of subsequent stages including the quality of the signal product, and (2) identifying stages in a manufacturing system where management should concentrate investments in process quality improvement. Our proposed procedure builds on the precedence ordering of the stages in the system and uses the information provided by correlations between the product quality measurements across stages. The starting point of our procedure is a computer executable network representation of the statistical relationships between the product quality measurements; execution automatically converts the network to a simultaneous-equations model and estimates the model parameters by the method of least squares. The parameter estimates are used to measure and rank the impact of each stage's performance on variability in intermediate stage and final product quality. We extend our work by presenting an economic model, which uses these results, to guide management in deciding on the amount of investment in process quality improvement for each stage. We report some of the findings from an extensive empirical validation of our procedure using circuit board production line data from a major electronics manufacturer. The empirical evidence presented here highlights the importance of accounting for quality linkages across stages in (a) identifying the sources of variation in product quality and (b) allocating investments in process quality improvement.

Keywords: Quality and Process Improvement; Total Quality Management; Investments in Learning; Multistage Manufacturing Systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.5.591.7804 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:48:y:2002:i:5:p:591-606

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().