Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns
Michelle Gittelman () and
Bruce Kogut ()
Additional contact information
Michelle Gittelman: Department of Management and Organizational Behavior, New York University, Stern School of Business, 44 West 4th Street, Tisch 7-11, New York, New York 10012
Bruce Kogut: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, and Centre de Recherche en Gestion, Ecole Polytechnique, 1, rue Descartes, Paris 75005, France
Management Science, 2003, vol. 49, issue 4, 366-382
Abstract:
This study looks at the United States biotechnology industry as a community of practice caught between two evolutionary logics by which valuable scientific knowledge and valuable innovations are selected. We analyze the publications and patents of 116 biotechnology firms during the period 1988--1995. In models that link scientific capabilities to patent citations, we show that scientific ideas are not simply inputs into inventions; important scientific ideas and influential patents follow different and conflicting selection logics. Publication, collaboration, and science intensity are associated with patented innovations; however, important scientific papers are negatively associated with high-impact innovations. These results point to conflicting logics between science and innovation, and scientists must contribute to both while inhabiting a single epistemic community. We identify individuals listed on patents and scientific papers and find they effectively integrate science with innovation, leading to more successful innovations. Our findings suggest that the role of the small, research-intensive firm is to create a repository of knowledge; to act as an organizational mechanism to combine the capabilities of versatile scientists within and outside the boundaries of the firm; and to manage the selection of scientific ideas to produce valuable technical innovations.
Keywords: Science; Citations; Patents; Scientists; Epistemic Community; Biotechnology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (274)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.366.14420 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:49:y:2003:i:4:p:366-382
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().