How Communication Links Influence Coalition Bargaining: A Laboratory Investigation
Gary Bolton (),
Kalyan Chatterjee () and
Kathleen L. McGinn ()
Additional contact information
Kalyan Chatterjee: Department of Economics, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Kathleen L. McGinn: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Management Science, 2003, vol. 49, issue 5, 583-598
Abstract:
Complexity of communication is one of the important factors that distinguishes multilateral negotiation from its bilateral cousin. We investigate how the communication configuration affects a three-person coalition negotiation. Restricting who can communicate with whom strongly influences outcomes, and not always in ways that current theory anticipates. Competitive frictions, including a tendency to communicate offers privately, appear to shape much of what we observe. Our results suggest that parties with weaker alternatives would benefit from a more constrained structure, especially if they can be the conduit of communication, while those endowed with stronger alternatives would do well to work within a more public communication structure that promotes competitive bidding.
Keywords: Bargaining; Coalition; Communication; Experimental Economics; Game Theory; Negotiation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (43)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.5.583.15148 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:49:y:2003:i:5:p:583-598
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().