The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development

Manuel E. Sosa (), Steven D. Eppinger () and Craig M. Rowles ()
Additional contact information
Manuel E. Sosa: INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau, Cedex, France
Steven D. Eppinger: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Craig M. Rowles: Advance Engine Program, Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, East Hartford, Connecticut 06108

Management Science, 2004, vol. 50, issue 12, 1674-1689

Abstract: Product architecture knowledge is typically embedded in the communication patterns of established development organizations. While this enables the development of products using the existing architecture, it hinders the organization's ability to implement novel architectures, especially for complex products. Structured methods addressing this issue are lacking, as previous research has studied complex product development from two separate perspectives: product architecture and organizational structure. Our research integrates these viewpoints with a structured approach to study how design interfaces in the product architecture map onto communication patterns within the development organization. We investigate how organizational and system boundaries, design interface strength, indirect interactions, and system modularity impact the alignment of design interfaces and team interactions. We hypothesize and test how these factors explain the existence of the following cases: (1) known design interfaces not addressed by team interactions, and (2) observed team interactions not predicted by design interfaces. Our results offer important insights to managers dealing with interdependences across organizational and functional boundaries. In particular, we show how boundary effects moderate the impact of design interface strength and indirect team interactions, and are contingent on system modularity. The research uses data collected from a large commercial aircraft engine development process.

Keywords: product architecture; product development organizations; technical communication; design structure matrix; statistical network analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (74)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0289 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:50:y:2004:i:12:p:1674-1689

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().