Simulation of the New Product Development Process for Performance Improvement
Nadia Bhuiyan (),
Donald Gerwin () and
Vince Thomson ()
Additional contact information
Nadia Bhuiyan: Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Boulevard West, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G 1M8
Donald Gerwin: Eric Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
Vince Thomson: Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2K6
Management Science, 2004, vol. 50, issue 12, 1690-1703
Abstract:
This paper explores the linkages between key features of the new product development (NPD) process and NPD performance and suggests ways of designing the process to improve performance. Using a stochastic computer model, we examine, under varying uncertainty conditions, how the key features of overlapping and functional interaction affect the performance measures of development time and effort (total person-days for a project). Findings indicate that, first and foremost, whether or not overlapping occurs, increasing functional interaction eventually leads to a trade-off between development time and effort. Second, an Üearly-start-in-the-darkÝ approach of increasing overlapping with no functional interaction is inferior even to an Üover-the-wallÝ approach. Third, increasing overlapping when some functional interaction exists is beneficial in low uncertainty and harmful in high uncertainty. Fourth, concurrent engineering (CE) is appropriate under low uncertainty, while a type of sequential engineering (SE), different than the Üover-the-wallÝ approach, should be used under high uncertainty, and last, dedicated teams are suitable under high, and not low, uncertainty. We developed the model with the aid of a company and validated it against a published account of five case studies.
Keywords: new product development; concurrent engineering; sequential engineering; stochastic simulation; overlapping; cross-functional teams (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0309 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:50:y:2004:i:12:p:1690-1703
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().