EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Appropriability and Commercialization: Evidence from MIT Inventions

Emmanuel Dechenaux, Brent Goldfarb (), Scott Shane () and Marie Thursby
Additional contact information
Scott Shane: Department of Economics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Management Science, 2008, vol. 54, issue 5, 893-906

Abstract: The effects of appropriability on invention have been well studied, but there has been little analysis of the effect of appropriability on the commercialization of existing inventions. Exploiting a database of 805 attempts by private firms to commercialize inventions licensed from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) between 1980 and 1996, we explore the influence of several appropriability mechanisms on the commercialization and termination of projects to develop products based on university inventions. Our central hypothesis is that the relationship between a licensee's decision to either terminate or commercialize the invention is driven by the current market value of the invention, as well as the option value of delaying its commercialization. We use a competing risks framework that allows for nonparametric heterogeneity and correlated risks. We find that better appropriability in the sense of more effective patent strength and secrecy has a strong negative effect on the hazard of license termination. The effectiveness of learning has a strong positive effect on the hazard of technology commercialization, while lead time has a negative effect.

Keywords: competing risks; innovation; optimal stopping problem; patent scope; lead time; learning; university licensing; termination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0780 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Appropriability and Commercialization: Evidence from MIT Inventions (2006) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:54:y:2008:i:5:p:893-906

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:54:y:2008:i:5:p:893-906