The Red Queen, Success Bias, and Organizational Inertia
William P. Barnett () and
Elizabeth G. Pontikes ()
Additional contact information
William P. Barnett: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Elizabeth G. Pontikes: Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Management Science, 2008, vol. 54, issue 7, 1237-1251
Abstract:
Why do successful organizations often move in new directions and then fail? We propose that this pattern is especially likely among organizations that have survived a history of competition. Such experience adapts organizations to their environment, through so-called "Red Queen" evolution, but being well adapted for one context makes moving into new contexts more hazardous. Meanwhile, managers in such organizations infer from their histories of competitive success a biased assessment of their organization's ability to change. Consequently, although surviving competition makes organizational change especially hazardous, managers in surviving organizations are especially inclined to such initiatives. We develop these ideas in an empirically testable model, and find supportive evidence in estimates of the model using data from the history of the U.S. computer industry.
Keywords: competition; organizational learning; organizational change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0808 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:54:y:2008:i:7:p:1237-1251
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().