What Fraction of Stock Option Grants to Top Executives Have Been Backdated or Manipulated?
Randall A. Heron () and
Erik Lie ()
Additional contact information
Randall A. Heron: Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
Erik Lie: Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Management Science, 2009, vol. 55, issue 4, 513-525
Abstract:
We estimate that 13.6% of all option grants to top executives during the period 1996-2005 were backdated or otherwise manipulated. Our study primarily focuses on grants that were unscheduled and at-the-money, of which we estimate that 18.9% were manipulated. The fraction is 23.0% before the new two-day filing requirement took effect on August 29, 2002, and 10.0% afterward. For the minority of grants that are not filed within the required two-day window, the fraction of manipulated grants remains as high as 19.9%. We further find a higher frequency of manipulation among tech firms, small firms, and firms with high stock price volatility. In addition, firms that use smaller (non-big-five) auditing firms are more likely to file their grants late. Finally, at the firm level, we estimate that 29.2% of firms manipulated grants to top executives at some point between 1996 and 2005.
Keywords: executive compensation; stock option grants; backdating (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0958 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:55:y:2009:i:4:p:513-525
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().