Valuing Money and Things: Why a $20 Item Can Be Worth More and Less Than $20

A. Peter McGraw (), Eldar Shafir () and Alexander Todorov ()
Additional contact information
A. Peter McGraw: Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309
Eldar Shafir: Department of Psychology and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
Alexander Todorov: Department of Psychology and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544

Management Science, 2010, vol. 56, issue 5, 816-830

Abstract: The study of risky decision making has long used monetary gambles to study choice, but many everyday decisions do not involve the prospect of winning or losing money. Monetary gambles, as it turns out, may be processed and evaluated differently than gambles with nonmonetary outcomes. Whereas monetary gambles involve numeric amounts that can be straightforwardly combined with probabilities to yield at least an approximate "expectation" of value, nonmonetary outcomes are typically not numeric and do not lend themselves to easy combination with the associated probabilities. Compared with monetary gambles, the evaluation of nonmonetary prospects typically proves less sensitive to changes in the probability range (inside the extremes of certainty and impossibility), which, among other things, can yield preference reversals. Generalizing on earlier work that attributed similar findings to the role of affect in the evaluation process (Rottenstreich, Y., C. K. Hsee. 2001. Money, kisses, and electric shocks: An affective psychology of risk. Psych. Sci. 12(3) 185-190), we attribute the observed patterns to a fundamental difference in the evaluation of monetary versus nonmonetary outcomes. Potential pitfalls in the use of monetary gambles to study choice are highlighted, and implications and future directions are discussed.

Keywords: judgment and decision making; choice; monetary gambles; preference reversals; affect; value; money (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1147 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:56:y:2010:i:5:p:816-830

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().