Understanding the Two Components of Risk Attitudes: An Experimental Analysis

Jianying Qiu and Eva Maria Berger Steiger

Management Science, 2011, vol. 57, issue 1, 193-199

Abstract: Cumulative prospect theory introduced the weighting of probabilities as an additional component to capture risk attitudes. However, this addition would be a less significant challenge to expected utility theory (EU) if utility curvature and probability weighting showed strong positive correlation. In that case the utility curvature in EU alone, although not properly describing risky behavior in general, would still capture most of the variance of individual risk aversion. This study provides experimental evidence that such a strong and positive correlation does not exist. Although most individuals exhibit concave utility and convex probability weighting, the two components show no strong positive correlation. This paper was accepted by Peter Wakker, decision analysis.

Keywords: risk attitude; cumulative prospect theory; experimental study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1260 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Understanding the Two Components of Risk Attitudes: An Experimental Analysis (2010)
Working Paper: Understanding the Two Components of Risk Attitudes: An Experimental Analysis (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:57:y:2011:i:1:p:193-199

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().