EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Constant Proportion Debt Obligations: A Postmortem Analysis of Rating Models

Michael Gordy and SØren Willemann ()
Additional contact information
SØren Willemann: Barclays Capital, London E14 4BB, United Kingdom

Management Science, 2012, vol. 58, issue 3, 476-492

Abstract: In its complexity and its vulnerability to market volatility, the constant proportion debt obligation (CPDO) might be viewed as the poster child for the excesses of financial engineering in the credit market. This paper examines the CPDO as a case study in model risk in the rating of complex structured products. We demonstrate that the models used by Standard and Poor's (S&P) and Moody's fail in-sample specification tests even during the precrisis period and in particular understate the kurtosis of spread changes. Because stochastic volatility is the most natural explanation for the excess kurtosis, we estimate an extended version of the S&P model with stochastic volatility and find that the volatility-of-volatility is large and significant. An implication is that agency model-implied probabilities of attaining high spread levels were biased downward, which in turn biased the rating upward. We conclude with larger lessons for the rating of complex products and for modeling credit risk in general. This paper was accepted by Wei Xiong, finance.

Keywords: credit risk; securitization; structured credit; rating agencies; stochastic volatility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1433 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Constant proportion debt obligations: a post-mortem analysis of rating models (2010) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:58:y:2012:i:3:p:476-492

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:58:y:2012:i:3:p:476-492