EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Worst-Case Value at Risk of Nonlinear Portfolios

Steve Zymler (), Daniel Kuhn () and Berç Rustem ()
Additional contact information
Steve Zymler: Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Daniel Kuhn: Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Berç Rustem: Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

Management Science, 2013, vol. 59, issue 1, 172-188

Abstract: Portfolio optimization problems involving value at risk (VaR) are often computationally intractable and require complete information about the return distribution of the portfolio constituents, which is rarely available in practice. These difficulties are compounded when the portfolio contains derivatives. We develop two tractable conservative approximations for the VaR of a derivative portfolio by evaluating the worst-case VaR over all return distributions of the derivative underliers with given first- and second-order moments. The derivative returns are modelled as convex piecewise linear or--by using a delta-gamma approximation--as (possibly nonconvex) quadratic functions of the returns of the derivative underliers. These models lead to new worst-case polyhedral VaR (WPVaR) and worst-case quadratic VaR (WQVaR) approximations, respectively. WPVaR serves as a VaR approximation for portfolios containing long positions in European options expiring at the end of the investment horizon, whereas WQVaR is suitable for portfolios containing long and/or short positions in European and/or exotic options expiring beyond the investment horizon. We prove that--unlike VaR that may discourage diversification--WPVaR and WQVaR are in fact coherent risk measures. We also reveal connections to robust portfolio optimization. This paper was accepted by Dimitris Bertsimas, optimization.

Keywords: value at risk; derivatives; robust optimization; second-order cone programming; semidefinite programming (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (36)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1615 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:59:y:2013:i:1:p:172-188

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:59:y:2013:i:1:p:172-188