Is It Better to Average Probabilities or Quantiles?
Kenneth C. Lichtendahl (),
Yael Grushka-Cockayne () and
Robert L. Winkler ()
Additional contact information
Kenneth C. Lichtendahl: Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
Yael Grushka-Cockayne: Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
Robert L. Winkler: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
Management Science, 2013, vol. 59, issue 7, 1594-1611
Abstract:
We consider two ways to aggregate expert opinions using simple averages: averaging probabilities and averaging quantiles. We examine analytical properties of these forecasts and compare their ability to harness the wisdom of the crowd. In terms of location, the two average forecasts have the same mean. The average quantile forecast is always sharper: it has lower variance than the average probability forecast. Even when the average probability forecast is overconfident, the shape of the average quantile forecast still offers the possibility of a better forecast. Using probability forecasts for gross domestic product growth and inflation from the Survey of Professional Forecasters, we present evidence that both when the average probability forecast is overconfident and when it is underconfident, it is outperformed by the average quantile forecast. Our results show that averaging quantiles is a viable alternative and indicate some conditions under which it is likely to be more useful than averaging probabilities. This paper was accepted by Peter Wakker, decision analysis.
Keywords: probability forecasts; quantile forecasts; expert combination; linear opinion pooling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (59)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1667 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:59:y:2013:i:7:p:1594-1611
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().