Experiments on Compound Risk in Relation to Simple Risk and to Ambiguity

Mohammed Abdellaoui, Peter Klibanoff () and Lætitia Placido ()
Additional contact information
Peter Klibanoff: Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences Department, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Lætitia Placido: Paris School of Economics, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne UMR CNRS 8174, 75647 Paris Cedex 13, France; and Department of Economics and Finance, Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, New York 10010

Management Science, 2015, vol. 61, issue 6, 1306-1322

Abstract: We conduct experiments measuring individual behavior under compound risk, simple risk, and ambiguity. We focus on (1) treatment of compound risks relative to simple risks and (2) the relationship between compound risk attitudes and ambiguity attitudes. We find that compound risks are valued differently than corresponding reduced simple risks. These differences measure compound risk attitudes. These attitudes display more aversion as the reduced probability of the winning event increases. Like Halevy [Halevy Y (2007) Ellsberg revisited: An experimental study. Econometrica 75:503–536], we find an association between compound risk reduction and ambiguity neutrality. However, in contrast to the almost perfect identification in Halevy’s data, we find a substantially weaker relation in both directions. First, a majority of our ambiguity-neutral subjects fail to reduce compound risk. Second, almost a quarter of our subjects who reduce compound risk are nonneutral to ambiguity. All of the latter come from the more quantitatively sophisticated part of our subject pool.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1953 . This paper was accepted by Peter Wakker, decision analysis .

Keywords: ambiguity; Ellsberg paradox; reduction of compound lotteries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (88)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1953 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Experiments on compound risk in relation to simple risk and to ambiguity (2015)
Working Paper: Experiments on compound risk in relation to simple risk and to ambiguity (2015)
Working Paper: Experiments on compound risk in relation to simple risk and to ambiguity (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:61:y:2015:i:6:p:1306-1322

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().