Wisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in Funding the Arts
Ethan Mollick () and
Ramana Nanda ()
Additional contact information
Ethan Mollick: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Management Science, 2016, vol. 62, issue 6, 1533-1553
In fields as diverse as technology entrepreneurship and the arts, crowds of interested stakeholders are increasingly responsible for deciding which innovations to fund, a privilege that was previously reserved for a few experts, such as venture capitalists and grant-making bodies. Little is known about the degree to which the crowd differs from experts in judging which ideas to fund, and, indeed, whether the crowd is even rational in making funding decisions. Drawing on a panel of national experts and comprehensive data from the largest crowdfunding site, we examine funding decisions for proposed theater projects, a category where expert and crowd preferences might be expected to differ greatly. We instead find significant agreement between the funding decisions of crowds and experts. Where crowds and experts disagree, it is far more likely to be a case where the crowd is willing to fund projects that experts may not. Examining the outcomes of these projects, we find no quantitative or qualitative differences between projects funded by the crowd alone and those that were selected by both the crowd and experts. Our findings suggest that crowdfunding can play an important role in complementing expert decisions, particularly in sectors where the crowds are end users, by allowing projects the option to receive multiple evaluations and thereby lowering the incidence of “false negatives.” This paper was accepted by Lee Fleming, entrepreneurship and innovation .
Keywords: crowdfunding venture funding; theater; judgement; communities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Wisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in Funding the Arts (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:62:y:2016:i:6:p:1533-1553
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Mirko Janc ().