Why Are Losses Less Persistent Than Profits? Curtailments vs. Conservatism

Alastair Lawrence (), Richard Sloan () and Estelle Sun ()
Additional contact information
Alastair Lawrence: Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
Richard Sloan: Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
Estelle Sun: Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Management Science, 2018, vol. 64, issue 2, 673-694

Abstract: It is well documented that losses are less persistent than profits and that stock prices anticipate the lower persistence of losses. Yet the underlying explanation for these results is unclear. One explanation lies in the abandonment option, whereby firms with losses are more likely to curtail operations (e.g., Hayn [Hayn C (1995) The information content of losses. J. Accounting Econom. 20(2):125–153]). Another explanation involves timely loss recognition stemming from conservative accounting (e.g., Basu [Basu S (1997) The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. J. Accounting Econom. 24(1):3–37]). We provide direct evidence that curtailments are an important factor contributing to the lower persistence of losses. An implication of our results is that popular measures of conservatism, such as the measure proposed by Basu, also reflect curtailments. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting.

Keywords: conservatism; conditional conservatism; loss persistence; abandonment option; curtailment; asset impairment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/mnsc.2016.2624 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:64:y:2018:i:2:p:673-694

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().