Competition-Based Dynamic Pricing in Online Retailing: A Methodology Validated with Field Experiments
Marshall Fisher (),
Santiago Gallino () and
Jun Li ()
Additional contact information
Marshall Fisher: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Santiago Gallino: Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Jun Li: Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Management Science, 2018, vol. 64, issue 6, 2496-2514
Abstract:
A retailer following a competition-based dynamic-pricing strategy tracks competitors’ price changes and then must answer the following questions: (i) Should we respond? (ii) If so, to whom? (iii) How much of a response? (iv) And on which products? The answers require unbiased measures of price elasticity as well as accurate estimates of competitor significance and the extent to which consumers compare prices across retailers. There are two key challenges to quantify these factors empirically: first, the endogeneity associated with almost any type of observational data, where prices are correlated with demand shocks observable to pricing managers but not to researchers, and second, the absence of competitor sales information, which prevents efficient estimation of a full consumer-choice model. We address the first issue by conducting a field experiment with randomized prices. We resolve the second issue by exploiting the retailer’s own and competitors’ stockouts as a source of variation to the consumer choice set, in addition to variations in competitors’ prices. We estimate an empirical model capturing consumer choices among substitutable products from multiple retailers. Based on the estimates, we propose and test a best-response pricing strategy through a carefully controlled live experiment that lasts five weeks. The experiment documents an 11% revenue increase while maintaining a margin above a retailer-specified target.
Keywords: online retailing; field experiment; competition-based dynamic pricing; stockouts; consumer choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.287/mnsc.2017.2753 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:64:y:2018:i:6:p:2496-2514
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().