Consumer Subsidies with a Strategic Supplier: Commitment vs. Flexibility
Jonathan Chemama (),
Maxime C. Cohen (),
Ruben Lobel () and
Georgia Perakis ()
Additional contact information
Jonathan Chemama: École Centrale Paris, 91190 Paris, France
Maxime C. Cohen: Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012
Ruben Lobel: Airbnb, San Francisco, California 94103
Georgia Perakis: MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Management Science, 2019, vol. 65, issue 2, 681-713
Abstract:
Governments use consumer incentives to promote green technologies (e.g., solar panels and electric vehicles). Our goal in this paper is to study how policy adjustments over time will interact with production decisions from the industry. We model the interaction between a government and an industry player in a two-period game setting under uncertain demand. We show how the timing of decisions affects the risk sharing between the government and the supplier, ultimately affecting the cost of the subsidy program. In particular, we show that when the government commits to a fixed policy, it encourages the supplier to produce more at the beginning of the horizon. Consequently, a flexible subsidy policy is on average more expensive, unless there is a significant negative demand correlation across time periods. However, we show that the variance of the total sales is lower in the flexible setting, implying that the government’s additional spending reduces the adoption level uncertainty. In addition, we show that for flexible policies, the supplier is better off in terms of expected profits, whereas the consumers can either benefit or not depending on the price elasticity of demand. Finally, we test our insights with a numerical example calibrated on data from a solar subsidy program.
Keywords: government subsidies; strategic supplier; newsvendor; commitment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (33)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2962 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:2:p:681-713
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().