Has Section 404 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act Discouraged Corporate Investment? New Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Ana Albuquerque () and
Julie Lei Zhu ()
Additional contact information
Ana Albuquerque: Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; Católica-Lisbon School of Business & Economics, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal
Julie Lei Zhu: Fanhai International School of Finance, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Management Science, 2019, vol. 65, issue 7, 3423-3446
Abstract:
Prior studies conclude that an unintended consequence of firms complying with the Sarbanes–Oxley Act is lower levels of risk-taking activities, including investment. We first show that prior studies cannot isolate the effects of SOX from other contemporaneous events. We then use the implementation requirements of SOX404 to construct a natural experiment that isolates the effects of SOX404 for a sample of small firms. We do not find a reduction in investment and other risk-taking activities for firms that had to comply with SOX404, relative to other firms. Because small firms are expected to be the most adversely affected by the regulation, our results cast doubt on the notion that SOX404 had a negative impact on larger firms.
Keywords: SOX; Section 404; corporate investment; risk taking; regulation; natural experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3090 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:7:p:3423-3446
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().