Earmarking Donations to Charity: Cross-cultural Evidence on Its Appeal to Donors Across 25 Countries

Christoph Fuchs (), Martijn G. de Jong () and Martin Schreier ()
Additional contact information
Christoph Fuchs: TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany;
Martijn G. de Jong: Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands;
Martin Schreier: Department of Marketing, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Management Science, 2020, vol. 66, issue 10, 4820-4842

Abstract: Charity organizations differ in their practice of offering donors the option to earmark their contribution: allowing donors to select the project in which their money should be invested. This paper presents two studies that provide the first empirical evidence on the appeal of such earmarking. The empirical basis of Study 1 is a unique data set consisting of 7,383 potential donors from 25 countries who participated in a randomized survey experiment. First, we find that the willingness to donate is significantly higher when earmarking is allowed. Second, we find that the effect of earmarking substantially differs in magnitude across countries. Third, we identify two cross-cultural interactions. Specifically, earmarking is less effective in countries that score lower on autonomy relative to embeddedness and in those scoring lower on egalitarianism relative to hierarchy. Fourth, we find that the earmarking effect is driven mainly by the activation of more donors and not by increases in the amounts that donors contribute. Study 2 is a follow-up experiment that replicates the basic earmarking effect, addresses limitations of our cross-cultural study, and sheds some preliminary light on the effect’s underlying process. We find that earmarking options increase potential donors’ perceptions of being able to make specific impact and also that this sense of agency helps us to understand an individual’s increased willingness to donate.

Keywords: donations; charity; prosocial behavior; earmarking; cross-cultural comparisons; cultural value dimensions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3397 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:10:p:4820-4842

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().