What Drives Risk Perception? A Global Survey with Financial Professionals and Laypeople
Felix Holzmeister (),
Jürgen Huber (),
Michael Kirchler (),
Florian Lindner (),
Utz Weitzel () and
Stefan Zeisberger ()
Additional contact information
Jürgen Huber: Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
Michael Kirchler: Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
Utz Weitzel: School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands; Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, 6525AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands; Tinbergen Institute, 1082 MS Amsterdam, Netherlands
Stefan Zeisberger: Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, 6525AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Banking and Finance, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
Management Science, 2020, vol. 66, issue 9, 3977-4002
Risk is an integral part of many economic decisions and is vitally important in finance. Despite extensive research on decision making under risk, little is known about how risks are actually perceived by financial professionals, the key players in global financial markets. In a large-scale survey experiment with 2,213 finance professionals and 4,559 laypeople in nine countries representing ~50% of the world’s population and more than 60% of the world’s gross domestic product, we expose participants to return distributions with equal expected return, and we systematically vary the distributions’ next three higher moments. Of these, skewness is the only moment that systematically affects financial professionals’ perception of financial risk. Strikingly, variance does not influence risk perception, even though return volatility is the most common risk measure in finance in both academia and the industry. When testing other, compound risk measures, the probability to experience losses is the strongest predictor of what is perceived as being risky. Analyzing professionals’ propensity to invest, skewness and loss probability also have strong predictive power, while volatility and kurtosis have some additional effect. Our results are very similar for laypeople, and they are robust across and within countries with different cultural backgrounds, as well as for different job fields of professionals.
Keywords: risk perception; investment propensity; financial professionals (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: What Drives Risk Perception? A Global Survey withFinancial Professionals and Lay People (2019)
Working Paper: What Drives Risk Perception? A Global Survey with Financial Professionals and Lay People (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:9:p:3977-4002
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Matthew Walls ().