An Equivalence Between Fair Division and Wagering Mechanisms
Rupert Freeman (),
Jens Witkowski (),
Jennifer Wortman Vaughan () and
David M. Pennock ()
Additional contact information
Rupert Freeman: Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
Jens Witkowski: Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany
Jennifer Wortman Vaughan: Microsoft Research, New York, New York 10012
David M. Pennock: Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08854
Management Science, 2024, vol. 70, issue 10, 6704-6723
Abstract:
We draw a surprising and direct mathematical equivalence between the class of fair division mechanisms, designed to allocate divisible goods without money, and the class of weakly budget-balanced wagering mechanisms, designed to elicit probabilities. Although this correspondence between fair division and wagering has applications in both settings, we focus on its implications for the design of incentive-compatible fair division mechanisms. In particular, we show that applying the correspondence to competitive scoring rules, a prominent class of wagering mechanisms based on proper scoring rules, yields the first incentive-compatible fair division mechanism that is both fair (proportional and envy-free) and responsive to agent preferences. Moreover, for two agents, we show that competitive scoring rules characterize the whole class of nonwasteful and incentive-compatible fair division mechanisms, subject to mild technical conditions. As one of several consequences, this allows us to resolve an open question about the best possible approximation to optimal utilitarian welfare that can be achieved by any incentive-compatible mechanism. Finally, because the equivalence greatly expands the set of known incentive-compatible fair division mechanisms, we conclude with an evaluation of this entire set, comparing the mechanisms’ axiomatic properties and examining their welfare performance in simulation.
Keywords: fair resource allocation; forecasting; elicitation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.02615 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:10:p:6704-6723
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().