Belief Updating Beyond the Two-State Setting

Hannes Mohrschladt (), Maren Baars () and Thomas Langer ()
Additional contact information
Hannes Mohrschladt: Finance Center Münster, University of Münster, D-48143 Münster, Germany
Maren Baars: Finance Center Münster, University of Münster, D-48143 Münster, Germany
Thomas Langer: Finance Center Münster, University of Münster, D-48143 Münster, Germany

Management Science, 2024, vol. 70, issue 10, 6761-6777

Abstract: Heuristics and biases in probabilistic belief updating have typically been examined in simple two-state experimental settings. We argue that the two-state setting has probabilistic properties that do not extend to settings with more states. With three states, we find that individuals apply similar heuristics, such as representativeness and anchoring, when providing posterior probability distributions. However, because of the different normative benchmark, the use of these heuristics results in different biases for point estimates. In particular, we demonstrate that the well-known finding of stronger underinference for larger signal sets does not translate from the two-state to the three-state setting. Our findings caution against an indiscriminate transfer of updating biases observed in two-state settings to a broad set of real-world applications.

Keywords: two-state setting; information weight; over- and underinference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00513 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:10:p:6761-6777

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().