EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Facility Location Decisions with Random Disruptions and Imperfect Estimation

Michael K. Lim (), Achal Bassamboo (), Sunil Chopra () and Mark S. Daskin ()
Additional contact information
Michael K. Lim: Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820
Achal Bassamboo: Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Sunil Chopra: Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Mark S. Daskin: Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2013, vol. 15, issue 2, 239-249

Abstract: Supply chain disruptions come with catastrophic consequences in spite of their low probability of occurrence. In this paper, we consider a facility location problem in the presence of random facility disruptions where facilities can be protected with additional investments. Whereas most existing models in the literature implicitly assume that the disruption probability estimate is perfectly accurate, we investigate the impact of misestimating the disruption probability. Using a stylized continuous location model, we show that underestimation in disruption probability results in greater increase in the expected total cost than overestimation. In addition, we show that, when planned properly, the cost of mitigating the misestimation risk is not too high. Under a more generalized setting incorporating correlated disruptions and finite capacity, we numerically show that underestimation in both disruption probability and correlation degree result in greater increase in the expected total cost compared to overestimation. We, however, find that the impact of misestimating the correlation degree is much less significant relative to that of misestimating the disruption probability. Thus, managers should focus more on accurately estimating the disruption probability than the correlation.

Keywords: logistics and transportation; supply chain disruptions; facility network design; estimation error; correlated disruptions; continuous approximation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (50)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.1120.0413 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:15:y:2013:i:2:p:239-249

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-24
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:15:y:2013:i:2:p:239-249