Signaling Quality via Long Lines and Uninformative Prices

Laurens Debo (), Uday Rajan () and Senthil K. Veeraraghavan ()
Additional contact information
Laurens Debo: Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Uday Rajan: Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Senthil K. Veeraraghavan: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2020, vol. 22, issue 3, 513-527

Abstract: Problem definition : We study the following puzzle: why do firms sometimes nurture long wait lines, rather than raising prices (to eliminate these lines)? Academic/practical relevance : In economic theory, prices are studied as a signal of quality, in absence of congestion (wait lines). We study price signaling when customers not only infer quality information from the price, but also from wait lines. Methodology : We developed a stylized model based on queuing and price signaling theory. The firm, privately informed about its quality (high or low), first determines its price. Next, customers arrive according to a Poisson process, observe the price and the wait line upon arrival, and decide whether to purchase. Results : When the proportion of informed consumers is low, to separate on price a high-quality firm must raise its price above the monopoly price. We show that there exist pooling equilibria in which firms instead charge a price lower than the monopoly price. We characterize two pooling equilibria. In both equilibria, a high-quality firm on average has a longer queue than a low-quality one, and long lines signal high quality. In the first one, the price is sufficiently low that short lines in turn signal low quality, so that the queue length almost perfectly reveals the type of the firm. In the second one, the price is in an intermediate range (but remains lower than the monopoly price), and short lines are an imperfect signal of quality. In each of the pooling equilibria, the high-quality firm earns a higher profit than in the separating equilibrium, despite the longer lines. Managerial implications : An empirical implication of our model is that, over time, when more customers become informed about the quality, the price of a new high-quality good should increase and the expected waiting lines should decrease. Our model integrates elements of price signaling in economics and equilibrium queueing in operations research. We hope that our research stimulates further interest in signaling games in service operations environments.

Keywords: service operations; queueing theory; pricing and revenue management; game theory; signaling; operations strategy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0753 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:513-527

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().