Seeing the Bigger Picture? Ramping up Production with the Use of Augmented Reality

David Wuttke (), Ankit Upadhyay (), Enno Siemsen () and Alexandra Wuttke-Linnemann ()
Additional contact information
David Wuttke: Technische Universität München, TUM School of Management, TUM Campus Heilbronn, 74076 Heilbronn, Germany
Ankit Upadhyay: Technische Universität München, TUM School of Management, TUM Campus Heilbronn, 74076 Heilbronn, Germany
Enno Siemsen: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53707
Alexandra Wuttke-Linnemann: Center for Mental Health in Old Age, Landeskrankenhaus Mainz, 55122 Mainz, Germany

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2022, vol. 24, issue 4, 2349-2366

Abstract: Problem definition : Firms increasingly use augmented reality (AR) devices to improve their production ramp-up processes. These devices appear useful, yet little is known about their broader impact on worker productivity and behavior. Academic/practical relevance : Efficient production ramp-ups are particularly important when product life cycles are short. An ongoing debate among academics and practitioners pertains to how Industry 4.0, and AR devices in particular, can accelerate the ramp-up. The current study provides empirical evidence related to AR in the production ramp-up context, examines the strengths and weaknesses of AR, and tests four hypotheses, leading to a more nuanced view of AR use in the manufacturing ramp-up. Methodology : A framed field experiment in a manufacturing plant provides a test of how quickly workers can perform new tasks with and without AR support and how the use of AR affects their ability to suggest process improvements. Results : When faced with a new task, workers instructed by AR smart glasses use 43.8% less time to complete the task compared with a control group that relies on paper-based instructions. However, workers that use AR glasses consistently use 23% more time than the control group when both groups repeat the task without either AR or paper-based instructions. Task difficulty moderates this relationship; workers assigned to a more difficult task benefit the most from AR instructions. After the devices are removed, workers instructed based on paper improve their productivity faster through learning than those instructed by AR. In addition, the former group suggests better process improvements than the latter one. Managerial implications : Although these results indicate substantially higher productivity resulting from AR devices, they also support the view that, once instructed through AR devices, workers come to rely on this new technology without fully internalizing the task. This failure to internalize their task then leads workers to suggest less useful process improvements.

Keywords: production ramp-up; productivity; technology; augmented reality; AR; behavioral operations; field experiment; Industry 4.0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1070 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:2349-2366

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().