Prescriptive Analytics in Urban Policing Operations

Tobias Brandt (), Oliver Dlugosch (), Ayman Abdelwahed (), Pieter L. van den Berg () and Dirk Neumann ()
Additional contact information
Tobias Brandt: European Research Center for Information Systems, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
Oliver Dlugosch: Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3062PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
Ayman Abdelwahed: European Research Center for Information Systems, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
Pieter L. van den Berg: Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3062PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
Dirk Neumann: Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3062PA Rotterdam, Netherlands

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2022, vol. 24, issue 5, 2463-2480

Abstract: Problem definition: We consider the case of prescriptive policing, that is, the data-driven assignment of police cars to different areas of a city. We analyze key problems with respect to prediction, optimization, and evaluation as well as trade-offs between different quality measures and crime types. Academic/practical relevance: Data-driven prescriptive analytics is gaining substantial attention in operations management research, and effective policing is at the core of the operations of almost every city in the world. Given the vast amounts of data increasingly collected within smart city initiatives and the growing safety challenges faced by urban centers worldwide, our work provides novel insights on the development and evaluation of prescriptive analytics applications in an urban context. Methodology: We conduct a computational study using crime and auxiliary data on the city of San Francisco. We analyze both strong and weak prediction methods along with two optimization formulations representing the deterrence and response time impact of police vehicle allocations. We analyze trade-offs between these effects and between different crime types. Results: We find that even weaker prediction methods can produce Pareto-efficient outcomes with respect to deterrence and response time. We identify three different archetypes of combinations of prediction methods and optimization objectives that constitute the Pareto frontier among the configurations we analyze. Furthermore, optimizing for multiple crime types biases allocations in a way that generally decreases single-type performance along one outcome metric but can improve it along the other. Managerial implications: Although optimization integrating all relevant crime types is theoretically possible, it is practically challenging because each crime type requires a collectively consistent weight. We present a framework combining prediction and optimization for a subset of key crime types with exploring the impact on the remaining types to support implementation of operations-focused smart city solutions in practice.

Keywords: Smart City Operations; Crime Prediction; Prescriptive Policing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1022 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:5:p:2463-2480

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().