EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Adaptive Capacity Planning for Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Seokjun Youn (), H. Neil Geismar (), Chelliah Sriskandarajah () and Vikram Tiwari ()
Additional contact information
Seokjun Youn: Department of Management Information Systems, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
H. Neil Geismar: Department of Information and Operations Management, Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
Chelliah Sriskandarajah: Department of Information and Operations Management, Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
Vikram Tiwari: Department of Anesthesiology, Schools of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Schools of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212; Department of Biostatistics, Schools of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212; Department of Management, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37212

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2022, vol. 24, issue 6, 3135-3157

Abstract: Problem definition : We develop a framework to plan capacity in each of three sequential stages for ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). The interdependence of activities, their stochastic durations, and the uncertainties in patient-mix pose significant challenges to managing the capacity of each activity and to achieving a smooth patient ow by coordinating the stages for each patient's visit. These strategic and operational decisions must efficiently cover all variations of daily patient demand. The overall objective is to minimize the total cost incurred in satisfying this demand, where the total cost is defined as the sum of the overtime cost and the amortized construction cost for the three stages. Methodology/results : In contrast to the traditional top-down approach to capacity planning, our approach proposes a bottom-up strategy based on optimization methods and data analytics. Specifically, we model ASCs as hybrid ow shops (HFS) from the scheduling literature, then relax the fixed capacity assumption of traditional HFS problems by using the trade-o_ between the overtime cost and the amortized capacity construction cost. Because the HFS is strongly NP-hard, we develop a straightforward and easy to implement heuristic to find cost-efficient capacities for the three stages. Our computational study, informed by operational-level archival patient data, examines how stochastic business parameters, e.g., patient-mix, service durations, and overnight-stay probabilities, affect the capacity planning decision. Managerial implications : Timely capacity adjustment is important for ASC practitioners, but related research is limited. This study highlights the benefit of considering the three stages together for capacity planning, rather than focusing solely on the operating rooms. We expect our approach to guide the more than 5,700 ASCs in the U.S., which perform 23 million surgeries annually, to make appropriate investments that will improve ASC operations via capacity adjustment and patient scheduling.

Keywords: healthcare; ambulatory surgery center; capacity planning; hybrid flow shop (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1109 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:3135-3157

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:3135-3157