Evaluating Count Prioritization Procedures for Improving Inventory Accuracy in Retail Stores

Nicole DeHoratius (), Andreas Holzapfel (), Heinrich Kuhn (), Adam J. Mersereau () and Michael Sternbeck ()
Additional contact information
Nicole DeHoratius: Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Andreas Holzapfel: Department of Fresh Produce Logistics, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany
Heinrich Kuhn: Department of Business Administration, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany
Adam J. Mersereau: Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
Michael Sternbeck: Department of Business Administration, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2023, vol. 25, issue 1, 288-306

Abstract: Problem definition : We compare several approaches for generating a prioritized list of items to be counted in a retail store, with the objective of detecting inventory record inaccuracy and unknown out of stocks. Academic/practical relevance : We consider both “rule-based” approaches, which sort items based on heuristic indices, and “model-based” approaches, which maintain probability distributions for the true inventory levels updated based on sales and replenishment observations. Methodology: Our study evaluates these approaches on multiple metrics using data from inventory audits we conducted at European home and personal care retailer dm-drogerie markt. Results : Our results support arguments for both rule-based and model-based approaches. We find that model-based approaches provide versatile visibility into inventory states and are useful for a broad range of objectives but that rule-based approaches are also effective as long as they are matched to the retailer’s goal. We find that “high-activity” rule-based policies, which favor items with high sales volumes, inventory levels, and past errors, are more effective at detecting inventory discrepancies. The best policies uncover over twice the discrepancies detected by random selection. A “low-activity” rule-based policy based on low recorded inventory levels, on the other hand, is more effective at detecting unknown out of stocks. The best policy detects over eight times the unknown out of stocks found by random selection. Managerial implications: Our findings provide immediate guidance to our retail partner on appropriate methods for detecting inventory record inaccuracy and unknown out of stocks. Our approach can be replicated at other retailers interested in customized optimization of their counting programs.

Keywords: inventory theory and control; retailing; OM practice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1119 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:288-306

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().