EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Planning Horizons for the Dynamic Lot Size Model: Zabel vs. Protective Procedures and Computational Results

Rolf A. Lundin and Thomas E. Morton
Additional contact information
Rolf A. Lundin: University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Thomas E. Morton: Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Operations Research, 1975, vol. 23, issue 4, 711-734

Abstract: Forward algorithms that solve successively longer finite horizon problems and that possess good stopping rules (such as a planning horizon) seem better suited to the needs of a manager facing a partial information environment than the more common procedure of selecting a horizon [0, T ] in advance. In this light, the Wagner and Whitin forward algorithm with a planning horizon procedure for the dynamic lot size model goes far beyond computational savings. Building on additional results due to Zabel, we develop new planning horizon procedures and near planning horizon procedures. (A brief sketch of how to develop similar results for the production smoothing problem suggests that the basic methodology developed possesses some generality.) We present an extensive empirical study that reports that Wagner-Whitin planning horizons were found for a reasonably small subset of problems within 500 periods, while planning horizons, or at least near planning horizons, were found universally by the modified procedure. (The Zabel procedure was intermediate in power.) The number of periods until a “near” horizon seems to be given empirically by \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland,xspace}\usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document}$t = 5\sqrt{2K/hD}$\end{document} for the linear stationary case, where K is the setup cost, h the holding cost, and D the average demand rate. Extensions useful for a broad subset of the general concave cost case are also given.

Date: 1975
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.23.4.711 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:23:y:1975:i:4:p:711-734

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:23:y:1975:i:4:p:711-734