On Hedging and TRIAD Force Levels

Jerry denBroeder and Dave Mitchell
Additional contact information
Jerry denBroeder: Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc., Sunnyvale, California
Dave Mitchell: Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc., Sunnyvale, California

Operations Research, 1981, vol. 29, issue 5, 924-930

Abstract: The strategic forces of the United States collectively form a TRIAD of three components consisting of ICBMs, SLBMs, and bombers. To guard against the catastrophic (total) loss of any one component, the TRIAD could be structured so that the combined capability of the two remaining components is sufficient to perform the basic TRIAD mission. With respect to this assumed hedging concept and based upon an idealized model construct, component force level requirements are derived as measured by the fraction of the mission each individual component should be able to accomplish on its own. The analysis is generalized to include combined force postures of fewer or more components. A simple cost structure for the acquisition and maintenance of individual components is introduced, permitting comparison of systems comprising two, three, four, and more components, in terms of their total costs to achieve the mission while providing the desired hedge.

Keywords: 441 idealized model to analyze strategic TRIAD force structures; 448 force levels selection to hedge against loss of any one leg (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.29.5.924 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:29:y:1981:i:5:p:924-930

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().