Numerical Comparisons of Inventory Policies for Periodic Review Systems

Evan L. Porteus
Additional contact information
Evan L. Porteus: Stanford University, Stanford, California

Operations Research, 1985, vol. 33, issue 1, 134-152

Abstract: This paper studies the numerical computation of the two parameters (the reorder level s and the order up to level S ) of inventory policies for discrete time shortage cost systems. Our goal is to obtain approximately optimal policies with little computational effort. The paper introduces three new methods that are designed to achieve this goal. Two of the methods are shortcuts based on the method of Freeland and Porteus and one is a heuristic that makes several modifications to a standard continuous review approximation. The paper provides a fairly detailed survey of other methods for easily computing approximately optimal inventory policies. It then numerically compares all these methods on a reasonably broad range of problems. One of the shortcuts and the new heuristic method performed very well: the percentage error of their average costs was approximately 1%. Some commonly cited competing methods had percentage errors of over 10% and a commonly cited continuous review approximation had a percentage error of over 80%. To study the effect of extreme parameter choices in the test bed, the paper introduces a procedure to determine a subset of the parameter values, called the 1% contiguous test bed, for which each method performed well. The results show that, depending on the range of values that apply in a given practical situation, either (i) any of a large number of methods will yield good performance or (ii) a carefully selected method can achieve superior performance.

Keywords: 333 (s; S) policies; 366 approximately optimal (s; S) policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.33.1.134 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:33:y:1985:i:1:p:134-152

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().