The Confidence Profile Method: A Bayesian Method for Assessing Health Technologies

David M. Eddy
Additional contact information
David M. Eddy: Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Operations Research, 1989, vol. 37, issue 2, 210-228

Abstract: The Confidence Profile Method is a Bayesian method for adjusting and combining pieces of evidence to estimate parameters, such as the effect of health technologies on health outcomes. The information in each piece of evidence is captured in a likelihood function that gives the likelihood of the observed results of the evidence as a function of possible values of the parameter. A posterior distribution is calculated from Bayes formula as the product of the likelihood function and a prior distribution. Multiple pieces of evidence are incorporated by successive applications of Bayes' formula. Pieces of evidence are adjusted for biases to internal or external validity by modeling the biases and deriving “adjusted” likelihood functions that incorporate the models. Likelihood functions have been derived for one-, two- and multi-arm prospective studies; 2 × 2, 2 × n and matched case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. Biases that can be incorporated in likelihood functions include crossover in controlled trials, error in measurement outcomes, patient selection biases, differences in technologies, and differences in length of follow-up. Effect measures include differences of rates, ratios of rates, and odds ratios. The elements of the method are illustrated with an analysis of the effect of a thrombolytic agent on the difference in probability of 1-year survival after a heart attack.

Keywords: health care: assessment of health technologies; statistics; Bayesian: Bayesian method for assessing technologies; technology: assessment of health technologies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.37.2.210 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:37:y:1989:i:2:p:210-228

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().