Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons

Mark L. Spearman and Michael A. Zazanis
Additional contact information
Mark L. Spearman: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Michael A. Zazanis: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

Operations Research, 1992, vol. 40, issue 3, 521-532

Abstract: Concerns about American manufacturing competitiveness compel new interest in alternative production control strategies. In this paper, we examine the behavior of push and pull production systems in an attempt to explain the apparent superior performance of pull systems. We consider three conjectures: that pull systems have less congestion; that pull systems are inherently easier to control; and that the benefits of a pull environment owe more to the fact that WIP is bounded than to the practice of “pulling” everywhere. We examine these conjectures for analytically tractable models. In doing so, we not only find supporting evidence for our surmises but also identify a control strategy that has push and pull characteristics and appears to outperform both pure push and pure pull systems. This hybrid system also appears to be more general in its applicability than traditional pull systems such as Kanban.

Keywords: inventory/production: Kanban and other pull systems; production/scheduling: stochastic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.40.3.521 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:40:y:1992:i:3:p:521-532

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().