Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) Drawdown Analyses

Douglas W. Owens, Gregory S. Parnell and Robert L. Bivins
Additional contact information
Douglas W. Owens: United States Air Force
Gregory S. Parnell: Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
Robert L. Bivins: United States Air Force

Operations Research, 1996, vol. 44, issue 3, 425-434

Abstract: This study investigated the feasibility and impacts of various U.S. and USSR time-phased strategic force structure reduction alternatives (commonly referred to as drawdowns ) under the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). The study resulted from the Soviet Union's request for a U.S. position on the proposed Soviet drawdown limits. Treaty drawdown limits are time-phased numerical ceilings specified in the treaty, e.g., total weapons must be less than or equal to 8000 by January 1, 1996 and 6000 by January 1, 1998. Various modernized START force structures were evaluated under four drawdown limit alternatives. Two linear programming models (U.S. and USSR) were developed to rapidly assess each drawdown limit alternative. The models determined drawdown feasibility and identified the systems to dismantle each year to maximize force capability. For the U.S., the preferred drawdown limit alternatives were independent of the force structures considered, primarily because constraints on U.S. destruction rates drove the drawdown. For the USSR, significant differences occurred between each drawdown limit alternative, especially concerning multiple warhead systems like the SS-18. The results of this study were used to determine the U.S. START negotiation positions and assess the final START agreement.

Keywords: arms control; linear programming analysis of treaty limit provisions; linear programming; nuclear arms control agreement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.44.3.425 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:44:y:1996:i:3:p:425-434

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().