Too Much of a Good Thing?

Dana R. Clyman, Michael R. Walls and James S. Dyer
Additional contact information
Dana R. Clyman: Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
Michael R. Walls: Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401
James S. Dyer: Department of Management Science and Information Systems, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712

Operations Research, 1999, vol. 47, issue 6, 957-965

Abstract: This paper explores a seemingly paradoxical phenomenon associated with the use of expected-utility theory in capital-budgeting and risk-sharing decisions under uncertainity. As an investment prospect becomes better and better, decision makers using classic decision-analysis techniques may, in fact, prefer less and less of it. We explore this phenomenon in the very real context of petroleum company drilling-investment decisions and demonstrate that the phenomenon is pervasive. When we examined the prospect inventory of a major oil company, we found that an increase in the upside payoff would lead to a lower optimal working interest for the grand majority of its prospects. We also explore the underlying factors leading to this phenomenon to develop both intuition and understanding. These factors have to do with degree of risk aversion (the more risk averse you are, the less likely you are to increase your holdings of an improving prospect) and managerial perspectives on risk. Once understood, the results no longer seem surprising.

Keywords: design analysis; utility/performance; natural resources (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.47.6.957 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:47:y:1999:i:6:p:957-965

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().