Evaluating Portfolio Policies: A Duality Approach
Martin B. Haugh (),
Leonid Kogan and
Jiang Wang ()
Additional contact information
Martin B. Haugh: Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
Jiang Wang: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, and CCFR and NBER
Operations Research, 2006, vol. 54, issue 3, 405-418
Abstract:
The performance of a given portfolio policy can in principle be evaluated by comparing its expected utility with that of the optimal policy. Unfortunately, the optimal policy is usually not computable, in which case a direct comparison is impossible. In this paper, we solve this problem by using the given portfolio policy to construct an upper bound on the unknown maximum expected utility. This construction is based on a dual formulation of the portfolio optimization problem. When the upper bound is close to the expected utility achieved by the given portfolio policy, the potential utility loss of this policy is guaranteed to be small. Our algorithm can be used to evaluate portfolio policies in models with incomplete markets and position constraints. We illustrate our methodology by analyzing the static and myopic policies in markets with return predictability and constraints on short sales and borrowing.
Keywords: finance; portfolio; optimal control; applications (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1060.0279 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Evaluating Portfolio Policies: A Duality Approach (2003) 
Working Paper: Evaluating Portfolio Policies: A Duality Approach (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:54:y:2006:i:3:p:405-418
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().