An Analysis of the Impact of Passenger Profiling for Transportation Security

Huseyin Cavusoglu (), Byungwan Koh () and Srinivasan Raghunathan ()
Additional contact information
Huseyin Cavusoglu: School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083
Byungwan Koh: School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083
Srinivasan Raghunathan: School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083

Operations Research, 2010, vol. 58, issue 5, 1287-1302

Abstract: The proponents of airline passenger profiling claim that profiling will reduce the cost of security, improve the detection of attackers, increase the reliability of signals from screening devices, and reduce the inconvenience to normal passengers. In this paper we show that if the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) manually inspects all those passengers classified as likely attackers and sends others through a screening system, as it did when it deployed the Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS), then it is superior to no profiling on all four performance measures if and only if the quality of the profiler vis-à-vis that of the screening system is sufficiently high. If the quality of the screening device is sufficiently high, profiling could be detrimental on all four performance measures. On the other hand, if the TSA deploys two screening devices along with the profiler---each screening device optimally configured for each of the two groups of passengers---then profiling improves the reliability of screening device signals, reduces the inconvenience caused to normal passengers, and improves the social welfare even when quality of the screening device is high. One of the implications of our findings is that the security architecture used by the TSA when it deployed CAPPS could provide a strong support to the arguments by some against the use of profiling; however, if the TSA deploys a two-screening device architecture, it might not only blunt the criticism that profiling is discriminatory but also benefit normal passengers and overall society economically.

Keywords: aviation security; homeland and transportation security; screening systems; passenger profiling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0793 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:58:y:2010:i:5:p:1287-1302

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().