Who Is Next: Patient Prioritization Under Emergency Department Blocking

Wenhao Li (), Zhankun Sun () and L. Jeff Hong ()
Additional contact information
Wenhao Li: Department of Management Sciences, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Zhankun Sun: Department of Management Sciences, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
L. Jeff Hong: Department of Management Science, School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

Operations Research, 2023, vol. 71, issue 3, 821-842

Abstract: Upon arrival at emergency departments (EDs), patients are classified into different triage levels indicating their urgency. Using data from a large hospital in Canada, we find that, within the same triage level, the average waiting time (time from triage to initial assessment by a physician) of patients who are discharged is shorter than that of patients who are admitted for middle- and low-acuity patients, suggesting that the order in which patients are served deviates from first-come, first-served, and to a certain extent, discharged patients are prioritized over admitted patients. This observation is intriguing as, among patients of the same triage level, admitted patients—who need further care in the hospital—should be deemed no less urgent than discharged patients who only need treatment at the ED. To understand how ED decision makers choose the next patient for treatment, we estimate a discrete-choice model and find that ED decision makers apply urgency-specific delay-dependent prioritization. Moreover, we find that, when the ED blocking level is sufficiently low, admitted patients are prioritized over discharged patients for high-acuity patients, whereas disposition does not affect the prioritization of middle- and low-acuity patients. When the ED blocking level becomes sufficiently high, decision makers start to prioritize discharged patients in an effort to avoid further blocking the ED. We then analyze a stylized model to explain the rationale behind the change in decision makers’ prioritization behavior as the ED blocking level increases. Using a simulation study, we demonstrate how policies inspired by our findings improve ED operations by reducing the average patient waiting time and length of stay, resulting in significant cost savings for hospitals. We also show how to leverage our findings to improve the accuracy of ED waiting time predictions. By testing and highlighting the central role of decision makers’ patient prioritization behavior, this paper advances our understanding of ED operations and patient flow.

Keywords: Special Issue on Behavioral Queueing Science; patient prioritization; ED blocking; discrete-choice model; MDP; simulation; waiting time prediction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2187 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:71:y:2023:i:3:p:821-842

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().