Simple Monotonic Readjustment Policies with Applications to Markdown Pricing and Pricing in the Presence of Strategic Customers
Yiwei Chen () and
Stefanus Jasin ()
Additional contact information
Yiwei Chen: Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122
Stefanus Jasin: Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Operations Research, 2024, vol. 72, issue 5, 1893-1905
Abstract:
We consider a canonical revenue management problem wherein a monopolist seller seeks to maximize expected total revenues from selling a fixed inventory of a product to customers who arrive sequentially over time, and the seller is restricted to implement a pricing policy that is monotonic (either nonincreasing or nondecreasing) over time. Gallego and Van Ryzin [Gallego G, Van Ryzin G (1994) Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochastic demand over finite horizons. Management Sci . 40(8):999–1020] show that the simplest monotonic price policy, the fixed price policy, is asymptotically optimal in the high-volume regime in which both the seller’s initial inventory and the length of the selling horizon are proportionally scaled. Specifically, the revenue loss of the fixed price policy is O ( k 1 / 2 ) , where k is the system’s scaling parameter. Following the publication of Gallego and Van Ryzin [Gallego G, Van Ryzin G (1994) Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochastic demand over finite horizons. Management Sci . 40(8):999–1020], several papers have attempted to improve the performance of the fixed price policy. Among them, Jasin [Jasin S (2014) Reoptimization and self-adjusting price control for network revenue management. Oper. Res . 62(5):1168–1178] develops a simple modification of the fixed price policy (that allows prices to move either up or down) with a guaranteed revenue loss of order O ( ln k ) . In this paper, we propose a novel family of monotonic readjustment policy, which restricts the prices to only move in one direction (i.e., either up or down). We show that, if the seller updates the price for only a single time, then the revenue loss of our policy is O ( k 1 / 3 ( ln k ) 2 α ) for some α > 1 / 2 . If, however, the seller updates the prices with a frequency O ( ln k / ln ln k ) , then the revenue loss of our policy is O ( ( ln k ) 7 α ) for some α > 1 / 2 . These results show the power of dynamic pricing even in the presence of monotonic price restriction. We discuss two applications of our policy: markdown pricing and pricing in the presence of strategic customers. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.0774 .
Keywords: Market Analytics and Revenue Management; revenue management; dynamic pricing; markdown pricing; reoptimization; asymptotic optimality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.0774 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:5:p:1893-1905
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().