New Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problems with Ramping Constraints
Tiziano Bacci (),
Antonio Frangioni (),
Claudio Gentile () and
Kostas Tavlaridis-Gyparakis ()
Additional contact information
Tiziano Bacci: Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica “Antonio Ruberti,” Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 00185 Rome, Italy
Antonio Frangioni: Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa Largo B., 56127 Pisa, Italy
Claudio Gentile: Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica “Antonio Ruberti,” Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 00185 Rome, Italy
Kostas Tavlaridis-Gyparakis: Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa Largo B., 56127 Pisa, Italy
Operations Research, 2024, vol. 72, issue 5, 2153-2167
Abstract:
The unit commitment (UC) problem in electrical power production requires to optimally operate a set of power generation units over a short time horizon. Operational constraints of each unit depend on its type and can be rather complex. For thermal units, typical ones concern minimum and maximum power output, minimum up- and down-time, start-up and shut-down limits, ramp-up and ramp-down limits, and nonlinear objective function. In this work, we present the first mixed-integer nonlinear program formulation that describes the convex hull of the feasible solutions of the single-unit commitment problem comprising all the above constraints and convex power generation costs. The new formulation has a polynomial number of both variables and constraints, and it is based on the efficient dynamic programming algorithm proposed by Frangioni and Gentile together with the perspective reformulation . The proof that the formulation is exact is based on a new extension of a result previously only available in the polyhedral case, which is potentially of interest in itself. We then analyze the effect of using it to develop tight formulations for the more general UC problem. Because the formulation is rather large, we also propose two new formulations, based on partial aggregations of variables, with different trade-offs between quality of the bound and cost of solving the continuous relaxation. Our results show that navigating these trade-offs may lead to improved performances. Funding: A. Frangioni acknowledges the partial financial support by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [Grant 773897 “plan4res”]. A. Frangioni and C. Gentile acknowledge the partial financial support by the European Union Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions [Grant 764759 “MINOA”]. T. Bacci, A. Frangioni, and C. Gentile acknowledge the partial financial support by the Italian Ministry of Education program MIUR-PRIN [Grant 2015B5F27W “Nonlinear and Combinatorial Aspects of Complex Networks”]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.2435 .
Keywords: Optimization; unit commitment problem; ramp constraints; MIP formulations; dynamic programming; convex costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.2435 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:oropre:v:72:y:2024:i:5:p:2153-2167
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Operations Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().